*WARNING* I wrote this late in the night... after doing physics homework.. (which by the way isn't done)..
Yah, so I was thinkin (oh scary ya?) no matter what.. someone suffers. If you save the fly, the spider will die. You can't save both without one suffering. It's mind boggling really! SOMEONE has to suffer. SOMEONE has to lose.
Physics.. Newton's Law.. the 3rd one.. ya know.. the one that says "When one object exerts a force on a second object, the second exerts a force on the first that is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction".. yah that one!! Maybe when something good happens, something of equal degree will happen that's bad... but then... what IS bad?? What IS good for that matter?? They're just lables we give things. What separates the supposed good from teh supposed bad is the different views and ideas. (umm.. did I just contradict myself??)
Anyway.. there must be some sort of balance. It's like.. when you add all the positives and negatives in life, you're supposed to get zero r ight?? ( but then again...) an equillibruim?? Maybe.. what causes youre happpiness.. is another man's saddness??
@_@ and then I started thinking about parallel worlds (oh my.. too much FullMetal Alchemist for Sumiko!!). sure.. we live in a "universe" and uni means one.. but we've proven theories wrong before!!.. Perhaps black holes are a key to opening these worlds? Where do they go? There must be some sort of equal force pushing against it right?? :: points to Newton's third law:: EH I'LL SAVE IT FOR THEM PHYSICISTS SINCE THEY LOVE TO STUDY EVERYTHING!! afterall.. physics is the study of everything.
(so back to my FMA lol).. Equivalent Exchange. To obtain, one must give something of equal value. Perhaps mankind is not in equilibrium and that's why there's no peace. We live in a chaotic world. But if there was an evenness in people's ideas... then it really isn't balanced. What i mean is that if everyone suposedly agreed on these "good" ideas, then there would be no balance of "bad". If there wewre even amounts of "good" people and "bad" people, then they would split and that's not peace and harmony either. Maybe all humans need to be neutral. Equivalent Exchange. Maybe.. to obtain happiness.. someone must be unhappy. It's like the fly and the spider. If one lives.. the other must suffer. Hmm. Equivalent Exchange.. I think i can live with taht theory. If you increase your knowledge, you dull your senses. People aren't perfect because of equivalent exchange.. but hey.. what' is "pefrect" anyway?? Strengths and weaknesses. Determined by this theory? Perhaps being well rounded is the closest a person can get to an equlilbrium. I guess my point is that it's a win-lose situation. In order for one to win, another must lose. but even if it was a win-win situation, what must be given up for it??
Ooooh boy. This is what happens when you mix physics and lack of sleep!!
View User's Journal
Crazy Japanese Girl
.... It's another one of those weblogs ehh?? just like xanga, myspace and redblogs.. oh joy!! -_- well yeah.. I guess it wouldn't hurt to post here too..
![]() |